Fatima

From Wikihussain
Revision as of 14:55, 22 September 2019 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "Husayn" to "Hussain")
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Fatima
Native name
فاطمه
Born15–5 BH (605–615 AD)
Mecca
Died3 Jumada al-Thani 11 AH (18 August 632)
Medina
Spouse(s)Ali ibn Abi Talib
ChildrenHasan ibn Ali, Hussain ibn Ali, Muhsin ibn Ali (unborn), Zaynab bint Ali, Umm Kulthum bint Ali
Parents
  • Muhammad b. Abd Allah (father)
  • Khadija bint Khuwaylid (mother)
RelativesQasim ibn Muhammad (brother), Zainab bint Muhammad (sister), Ruqayyah bint Muhammad (sister), Umm Kulthum bint Muhammad (sister), Ibrahim ibn Muhammad (brother)

Fatima, (d. 11 AH/632 AD), daughter of Muhammad and Khadija, wife of ʿAli b. Abi Talib, mother of al-Hasan and al-Hussain, was the only one of the Prophet’s daughters to enjoy great renown. She became the object of great veneration by all Muslims. This may be because she lived closest to her father, lived longest, and gave him numerous descendants, who spread throughout the Muslim world. [1] She is also one of the People of Cloak and, in Twelver Shi’ite belief, one of the fourteen Infallibles. She was the only lady chosen by the Prophet Muhammad to be part of Mubahala with the Christian of Najran. History. In contrast to the rich hagiographic material on Fatima, purely historical information, reported particularly in Sunni sources, is rare and usually involves only insignificant episodes.

Biography

Fatima was probably the youngest daughter of Muhammad and his first wife, Khadija, the only daughter to live long enough to bear numerous offspring. Her date of birth is variously given as between five years before and two years after the beginning of the Prophet’s mission. [2] She was particularly close to her father and is said to have followed him to Medina shortly after his emigration (hejra). Although there is disagreement over details, she became the wife of the Imam ʿAli b. Abi Taleb while still an adolescent, probably in 2/623-24. Muhammad arranged this marriage in obedience to divine will, having already rejected requests for her hand by Abu Bakr, ʿOmar, and probably the very wealthy ʿAbd-al-Rahman b. ʿAwf. [3]

Before the occupation of the prosperous oasis of Khaybar ʿAli and Fatima were poor. As long as she lived Fatima was ʿAli’s only wife and bore him five children: Hasan, Hussain, Muhassen (or Muhsen, dead at very young age), Omm Kulthum, and Zaynab. She was apparently much affected by her father’s death and died of illness in Medina a few months later, in 11/633. Reports on her death, her burial, and the exact place of her grave are contradictory. [4] Today three sites in Medina are visited as her burial place.

Political Involvement

She seems to have performed only three acts of political significance, each recorded in almost all sources, both Sunni and Shiʿite, though in different versions. First, after the conquest of Mecca she refused her protection to Abu Sufyan; second, after the death of the Prophet she courageously defended ʿAli’s cause, fiercely opposed the election of Abu Bakr, and had violent disputes with him and particularly with ʿOmar; third, she laid claim to the property rights of her father and challenged Abu Bakr’s categorical refusal to cede them, particularly Fadak and a share in the produce of Khaybar.

Hagiography

Hagiographical material on Fatima is much more ample. Whereas Sunni authors emphasized her perfectly “orthodox” virtues, in particular her rank as the daughter of the Prophet, her ascetic life, and her exemplary piety, [5] Twelver Shiʿite hagiographers depicted her as a figure of cosmic significance, though early reports, as well as traditions attributed to her, are much scantier than those related to the other thirteen immaculate ones (maʿsum). Fatima was counted among the Prophet’s house (ahl al-bayt), the five people of the mantle (ahl al-kisa), and the people of the ordeal (mubahala) and thus occupies a central place in the pleroma of the immaculate ones, enjoying ontological, initiatory, and eschatological privileges of the same order as those attributed to the Prophet and the imams.

Her luminous pre-existential entity, issuing from the divine light thousands of years before the creation of the world, devoted itself to the praise of God while circumambulating the divine throne. [6] Her name, like those of all the people of the mantle, was derived from a divine name. [7] She was present in the light of the fourteen impeccable ones when it was placed in Adam’s loins (solb). It was because of this light that angels were ordered to prostrate themselves before him. [8] Among the names God taught to Adam [9] were those of the people of the mantle, including that of Fatima. [10]

Birth

Her conception and birth were miraculous. Her origin was in a fruit from paradise, often identified as an apple or a date, that Muhammad had eaten during one of his ascensions and that had become “the water of his loins”. [11] According to one tradition, this fruit had previously been touched by the sweat and a plume from the wing of the angel Gabriel. [12] It was for this reason that the Prophet always said that Fatima was a celestial being in human form (huraʾ ensiya), that she emitted the perfume of paradise, and that she had a name in heaven (usually Mansura). Fatima spoke with her mother while still in the womb. All the most pious women recognized from pre-Islamic religions were present at her birth, namely, Sarah, Asia, Sephora (Safuraʾ), and especially Mary the mother of Jesus. [13] These names are often linked with that of Fatima, and parallels with Mary are particularly frequent, parallels emphasized by Massignon in all his works on Fatima. [14] Yet Fatima’s superiority to other women is always underscored. She is given the epithet “the Great Lady/the Best of Free Women”. [15] At her birth Fatima pronounced sacred formulas and announced future events; the world was bathed in light. [16]

Main Attributes

In fact, light and Fatima are always linked: at the anthropogonic stage already mentioned, in Shiʿite commentaries on the Light verse, and at her birth and later in her life, especially when she prayed and meditated. She is said to have been “the source of the light on the horizon,” and it is for that reason that she is called “the Confluence of the Two Lights”, [17] and that her most famous epithet was al-Zahra. [18] Ibn Shahrashub [19] listed more than seventy honorary names for Fatima, among which the most common are Maryam Kobra (the supreme Mary), Batul, [20] and the mysterious Omm Abiha (Mother of her father), which has been variously interpreted.

In addition to light, the life of Fatima was characterized by piety; sadness over the destinies of her relatives and children; courage; obedience to God, her father, and her husband; and initiatory knowledge. [21] She is the guardian of two of the secret and sacred books of the immaculate ones, Ketab Fatima and Moshaf Fatima, which may in fact be only a single book, and two secret tablets, of white pearl and emerald respectively. [22] Miracles resulting from her superior nature, piety, and esoteric knowledge are frequently attributed to her. [23]

Other salient points in the hagiography of Fatima have been brought together by Veccia Vaglieri: her betrothal and marriage to ʿAli, raised to the level of cosmic events; her glorious resurrection on the Day of Judgment; her complaint to God about the injustices wreaked by the community on her kinsmen and followers; her intervention in favor of the Shiʿites; and her hagiography as it developed in other branches of Shiʿism, specifically the Bateniya.

Fatima in Quran

According to early Imami writings, the name Fatima is explicitly mentioned in the “integral” Koran, [24] and early Imami exegetes, finding allusions to Fatima in a number of suras, sometimes resorted to rather daring interpretations, for example, identification of the “night of the decree” (laylat al-qadr) or the “holy spirit” (al-ruh al-qods) with the daughter of the Prophet. [25] These interpretations differ little in nature from those of “extremist” (Gholat), some of whom identify her with the cavern of the Seven Sleepers or with the rock of Moses from which water gushes forth.[26] The distinction between early esoteric Imamism and the Shiʿism considered “extremist” must be made with great care. [27]

Folklore and Popular Devotion

Although little historical information on Fatima is available, her importance in myth and devotion is considerable throughout the Islamic world. Anecdotes, wonders, and miracles related to her birth, betrothal, wedding, virginity, pregnancy, motherhood, and powers have been elaborated. Interpretation of the koranic phrase “people of the (Prophet’s) house” (ahl al-bayt) as “family of the cloak” (al-e ʿaba) and cosmological notions of primordial light have greatly influenced her image in popular religion. Her blood relationship with the Prophet; the charisma associated with her husband, ʿAli, and their sons Hasan and Hussain, the only male perpetuators of Muhammad’s line; and her role as transmitter of traditions added to her importance for all Muslims. It was, however, mainly through Shiʿite devotion, whether moderate (partly shared by Sunnites) or extreme, that she became the foremost female figure in Islamic thought and piety. Popular veneration of Fatima thus remains closely linked to hagiographic, esoteric, and philosophical interpretations.

Fatima in Oriental Studies

The first substantial biography of Fatima, by Henri Lammens (1912), was mainly based on historical and Sunnite sources. Lammens’ rather antipathetic portrait of her was severely criticized by Louis Massignon, [28] who preferred to portray her both as an incarnation of divine vengeance [29] and especially as a compassionate mother akin to the Virgin Mary. [30] Henri Corbin took up Massignon’s study of Fatima, but with particular stress on redemption; unlike Massignon’s “transhistorical” approach, his method was rooted in gnostic theosophy. While accepting the main parallels between Fatima and Mary, he focused on her role as eternal feminine archetype, Fatima as Sophia, a manifestation of God and the feminine element of the Prophet and the Imams, whose own theophanic and initiatory functions depended on their degree of fatemiya. [31] Massignon’s original exposition of similarities between devotion to Mary and to Fatima, sometimes called Maryam Kobra, has been criticized, however; [32] the similarities remain partly conjectural, especially those involving the Marian cult at Fatima, Portugal. [33]

Corbin also drew parallels between Fatima and pre-Islamic Persian feminine archetypes embodied in Arədvi Sura Anahita. This connection was further stressed by Wilhelm Eilers in his study of Shiʿite holy water, heavenly and earthly waters having been part of Fatima’s dowry (mahr/mahriya), as was salt. [34] In popular belief Fatima has been linked with archetypes and natural elements connected to fertility rites: khezr/Elias, the rainbow, the jasmine flower, and the pomegranate. [35] She is also said to symbolize the cavern of the seven sleepers of Ephesus and the Masjed al-Aqsa, the goal of Muhammad’s night journey.

Fatima in Popular Culture

Esoteric or popular beliefs about Fatima, often connected with episodes in her hagiography, constitute the basis of several feasts and pilgrimages (ziara). The most important of the former are commemorations of the ordeal (mubahala) witnessed by the ahl al-ʿabaʾ, who are thus recognized as legitimate leaders of the community, celebrated on 21 Dhu’l-hejja; [36] of Fatima’s birth (mawludiya) on 21 Ramadan, with a secondary celebration on 15 Shaʿban (which also commemorates the birth of the Mahdi Fatemi; the laylat al-baraʿa; the death of Salman); of her death on 3 Jomada II, with a secondary celebration on 2 Ramadan; of her figure as al-Masjed al-Aqsa, on 27 Rajab, commemorating Muhammad’s meʿraj. [37] Specific ziarat are made for Fatima at Medina. [38] In private rawza-khani (recitation of the martyrdom of Hussain) assemblies held by Persian women at any time of year, the most popular story is of Fatima’s invitation to a wedding, where she converts those present. [39] Special offerings are dedicated to Fatima: small pots (digcha-ye hazrat-e Zahra) on the last Wednesday of Safar and samanu, a kind of pudding reputed to have been her favorite dish. [40] On the last Wednesday of the solar year chaharshanba suri some families used to break and replace their earthenware pots in her honor. [41] Offerings and thanks are dedicated to Fatima as an intercessor on various occasions and in various sanctuaries throughout the Islamic world. She is especially invoked by Shiʿite women during childbirth. [42]

Popular devotion finds its utmost expression in representations of redemptive suffering focused on the Karbala paradigm. As mistress of the bayt al-ahzan (house of sorrows) and the Day of Judgment, [43] Fatima is present in most rituals as an “icon”: She wears a crown for Muhammad, a necklace or sword for ʿAli, and earrings of diamonds and rubies for Hasan and Hussain. [44] Hussain’s daughters Fatima Kobra, who allegedly married her cousin Qasim b. Hasan at Karbala, and the sickly Fatima Soghra, who remained in Medina, were both named after her. [45] Banners (ʿAlam) related to Fatima are carried in Muharram processions. The 17th-century traveler Adam Olearius mentioned having seen at Ardabil a miraculous ʿalam allegedly made by her daughter. [46] The large Bibi ka ʿalam, made of gold (with pendant diamonds on each side symbolizing earrings), is carried on an elephant in Ashura processions at Hyderabad, Deccan, and is venerated by both Sunnites and Shiʿites. [47] The symbol of the open hand of Fatima (cf. the hand of God among Jews, of Mary among Christians) is widespread in Sunnite areas, [48] but among Shiʿites the open hand (panja) represents that of Hazrat-e ʿAbbas b. ʿAli (q.v.), severed at Karbala. [49] Rawza-khanis and other liturgies and rituals connected with Fatima also found their way into passion plays (taʿzia; see bibliography).

Beside Fatima’s name and variants, popular for Muslim girls, her epithets Zahra, Tahera, Zakiya, Raziya, Razia, Batul (virgin), Kaniz (maiden), and the like are also given as names, as are various diminutives: Fatayma/Fotaytom/Fattush, Foti/Foto in India. [50] Her name is sometimes given to girls born on Friday night. [51] Fatima as “sovereign of feminine humanity” [52] has been variously appreciated in recent history. Fatima has been idealized as a symbol of feminine excellence, a model of submission both to the will of God and her husband [53] and authenticity and liberation for all women (Shariʿati).

References

  1. Veccia Vaglieri, L. (2007). “Fāṭima”, in: Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, Edited by: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs.
  2. Lammens, pp. 8-14.
  3. Ibn Saʿd, pp. 11-20; Ibn Rostam, p. 12.
  4. Yaʿqūbī, Taʾrīḵ II, pp. 128-30; Tabari, III, pp. 2436 ff.; Masʿūdī, Morūj VI, p. 165.
  5. Abu’l-Nasr, pp. 72 ff.
  6. Ibn Babuya, 1385/1966 pp. 135 ff.; Khazzaz, pp. 110-11, 169-70.
  7. al-Fater “the Creator”; Ibn Babuya, 1405/1985, p. 252; No’mani, p. 137; Ibn ʿAyyash, p. 23.
  8. Hasan al-ʿAskari, pp. 219 ff.; Ibn Babuya, 1385/1966, pp. 6, 209; idem, 1405/1985, p. 255.
  9. Koran 2:31-33.
  10. Hasan al-ʿAskari, p. 217; Forat, p. 56.
  11. Forat, pp. 75-76; Ibn Babuya, 1385/1966, pp. 183-84.
  12. Forat, pp. 321-22.
  13. Ibn Rostam, p. 9; Hussain, pp. 48 ff.
  14. cf. Ayoub, 1976, pp. 165 ff.; idem, 1978, s.v.; McAuliffe, 1981.
  15. sayyedat/khiarat al-nesaʾ/al-haraʾer; cf. the epithet of the mother of the qaʾem “the Great Lady/the Best of Slave Women [al-emaʾ]; No’mani, pp. 331 ff.; Ibn Quluya, pp. 54, 78, 123-24.
  16. Ibn Shahrashub, pp. 119 ff.
  17. majmaʿ al-nurayn, i.e., those of exoteric prophecy and of the esoteric imamate; Marandi, pp. 4-19.
  18. Resplendent; Hussain, pp. 46 ff.; Ibn Shahrashub, pp. 106 ff.
  19. pp. 133 ff.
  20. lit., “Virgin,” defined by the Prophet as “she who never menstruates”; Ibn Babuya, 1385/1966, p. 181.
  21. ʿelm; for this translation, see Amir-Moezzi, pp. 174-99; on Fatima’s knowledge, cf. Hasan al-ʿAskari, pp. 221-22; Ibn Babuya, 1404/1984, p, 596; Ibn Shahrashub, pp. 102-4.
  22. Amir-Moezzi, pp. 188-89; Kohlberg, pp. 302-05.
  23. Ibn Shahrashub, pp. 16 ff.; Borsi, pp. 85-86; Majlesi, pp. 19-81.
  24. in 20:115; see Kolayni, p. 283; on the “integral” Koran, see Amir-Moezzi, pp. 200-27.
  25. Forat, pp. 581-82.
  26. characterized by Veccia Vaglieri, p. 849, as “deviant”
  27. Amir-Moezzi, pp. 313-16.
  28. 1969, I, pp. 570, 585 ff.
  29. 1969, I, pp. 514-22, a study of Fatima’s cult based on Nosayri Shiʿite texts mainly from Syria.
  30. Massignon, 1969, I, pp. 550-618; for parallels among Fatima, Moses’ sister Maryam, and Jesus’ mother, Maryam, see p. 584; idem, 1963, p. 267.
  31. 1960, p. 113 ff.; 1971-72, index.
  32. McAuliffe, 1981, pp. 27-28.
  33. Massignon, I, pp. 615 ff.; Eilers, p. 98.
  34. Eilers, pp. 97 ff.; Massé, Croyances et coutumes, p. 225.
  35. Massé, Croyances et coutumes, pp. 158 n. 2, 179, 212; Ayoub, 1978, p. 45.
  36. Schmucker; Massignon, 1969, I, pp. 550-91.
  37. Massignon, 1969, I, pp. 576-77.
  38. Massignon, 1969, III, pp. 295 ff.
  39. ʿarusi-e Qoraysh; Massignon, 1969, I, p. 580.
  40. Shakurzada, pp. 26-27, 46 ff., 83; Massé, Croyances et coutumes, p. 47 n. 2.
  41. Massé, Croyances et coutumes, p. 146 n. 2.
  42. Massignon, 1969, III, p. 296.
  43. Ayoub, 1978, pp. 48 ff., 212 ff.
  44. Massignon, 1969, I, pp. 517, 568, 583, 612; Kashefi, p. 67; Calmard, p. 416; Ayoub, pp. 213-14.
  45. Kashefi, pp. 24, 391 ff.; Calmard, pp. 390, 393, 401.
  46. Massé, Croyances et coutumes, p. 131.
  47. Hollister, p. 169; Pinault, pp. 158-59.
  48. Kriss and Kriss-Heinrich, I, p. 23, II, pp. 2 ff., with illustrations and references to Venus and Babylonian cults.
  49. Massé, Croyances et coutumes, p. 27 n. 1; Eilers, p. 111 n. 7.
  50. Schimmel, pp. 44, 69 ff.; on other names, see Veccia Vaglieri in EI2 II, pp. 847-48.
  51. Schimmel, p. 23 n. 41.
  52. Corbin, 1960, pp. 115 ff.; idem, 1971-72, IV, p. 314.
  53. Meer Hassan Ali, p. 97.

Bibliography

  • ʿO. Abu’l-Naṣr, Faṭema bent Muhammad omm al-šohadāʾ wa sayyedat al-nesāʾ, Cairo, 1366/1947.
  • M. A. Amir-Moezzi, Le guide divin dans le shiʿisme originel. Aux sources de l’ésotérisme en Islam, Paris, 1992; tr. D. Streight as The Divine Guide in Early Shiʿism, Albany, N.Y., 1994.
  • M. Ayoub, “Towards an Islamic Christology: An Image of Jesus in Early Shīʿī Muslim Literature,” Muslim World 66, 1976, pp. 163-88.
  • Idem, Redemptive Suffering in Islam: A Study of the Devotional Aspects of ʿÃshûrâ in Twelver Shiʿism, The Hague, 1978.
  • Muhammad Bukhari, al-Jāmeʿ al-ṣaḥīḥ, n.p. [Cairo], 1360/1940.
  • Ḥāfeẓ Rajab Borsī, Mašāreq anwār al-yaqīn, 10th ed., Beirut, n.d.
  • H. Corbin, Terre céleste et corps de résurrection. De l’Iran mazdéen à l’Iran shiʿite, Paris, 1960.
  • Idem, En Islam iranien, 4 vols., Paris 1971-72. al-Ḏarīʿa I, pp. 343-44.
  • Ibn Ayyāš Jawharī, Moqtażab al-aṯar, Tehran, 1346/1927.
  • Ibn Bābuya, ʿElal al-šarāʾīʿ wa’l-aḥkām, 2 vols. in 1, Najaf, 1385/1966.
  • Idem, al-Amālī, ed. and tr. M.–B. Kamaraʾī, Tehran, 1404/1984.
  • Idem, Kamāl al-din wa tamām al-neʿma, 2 vols. in 1, ed. ʿA.–A. Ḡaffārī, Qom, 1405/1985.
  • Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal, Mosnad IV, Cairo, 1311/1893.
  • Ibn Qūlūya Qomī, Kāmel al-ziarat, 11th. ed., n.p., n.d.
  • Ibn Qotayba (attributed), al-Emāma wa’l-sīāsa, ed. A. Rāfeʿī, Cairo, 1957, esp. pp. 12-13.
  • Ibn Rostam Tabari, Dalāʾel al-emāma, Najaf, 1369/1949, pp. 1-58.
  • Ibn Saʿd, al-Ṭabaqāt al-kobrā VIII, Beirut, 1968, pp. 11-20.
  • Ibn Shahrashub, Manāqeb āl Abī Ṭāleb III, Najaf, 1375/1956, pp. 101-40.
  • ʿEmād-al-Dīn Hussain Eṣfahānī, Zendagānī-e čahārdah maʿṣūm I, Tehran, 1340 Š./1962, pp. 221-358.
  • Moḥsen Fayż Kāšānī, al-Wāfī, Tehran, 1376/1957, pp. 172 ff.
  • Forat b. Ebrāhīm, Tafsīr, ed. M. Kāẓem, Tehran, 1410/1990.
  • Nūr-al-Dīn Ḥalabī, al-Sira al-ḥalabīya III, Beirut, n.d., pp. 529, 607 ff.
  • Hasan al-ʿAskari (attributed), Tafsīr, Qom, 1409/1989.
  • Hussain b. ʿAbd-al-Wahhāb, ʿOyūn al-moʿjezāt, Najaf, 1369/1950.
  • Abu’l-Qāsem ʿAli Ḵazzāz Rāzī, Kefāyat al-aṯar fi’l-naṣṣ ʿalā aʾemma al-eṯnay ʿašar, Tehran, 1305/1888.
  • E. Kohlberg, “Authoritative Scriptures in Early Imami Shiʿism,” in E. Patlagean and A. Le Boulluec, eds., Les retours aux Écritures. Fondamentalismes présents et passés, Louvain and Paris, 1993, pp. 295-312.
  • Muhammad b. Yaʿqūb Kolaynī, al-Oṣūl men al-kāfī, ed. and tr. J. Moṣṭafawī, II, Tehran, n.d., pp. 355-56.
  • H. Lammens, Fāṭima et les filles de Mahomet: Notes critiques pour l’étude de la Sīra, Rome, 1912.
  • J. D. McAuliffe, “Chosen of All Women: Mary and Fāṭimah in Qurʾānic Exegesis,” Islamochristiana 7, 1981, pp. 19-28.
  • Muhammad-Bāqer Majlesī, Beḥār al-anwār XLIII, Tehran and Qom, 1376-92/1956-72, pp. 2-236.
  • Abu’l-Hasan ʿAli Marandī, Majmaʿ al-nūrayn wa moltaqa’l-baḥrayn fī aḥwāl … Fatima al-Zahra, Tehran, 1376/1957.
  • L. Massignon, “Les origines de la méditation shiʿite sur Salmân et Fâṭima,” in Mélanges Henri Massé, Tehran, 1963, pp. 264-68.
  • Idem, Opera Minora, ed. Y. Moubarak, 3 vols., Paris, 1969.
  • Masʿūdī, Morūj IV, pp. 146, 156 ff.; VI, pp. 55-56, 165.
  • Ibn Abī Zaynab No’mani, Ketāb al-ḡayba, ed. ʿA.–A. Ḡaffārī, Tehran, 1397/1977.
  • ʿAli b. Ebrāhīm Qomī, Tafsīr, ed. Ṭ. M.. Jazāʾerī, 2 vols., Najaf, 1386-87 /1966-68.
  • U. Rubin, “Pre-Existence and Light: Aspects of the Concept of Nūr Muḥammad,” Israel Oriental Studies 5, 1975, pp. 62-119.
  • T. Sabri, “L’hagiographie de Fâṭima d’après le Biḥâr al-Anwâr de Muḥammad Bâqir Majlisî (m. 1111/1699),” Ph.D. diss., École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris, 1969.
  • Tabari (Cairo2), I-II, s.v. Abu ʿĪsā Muhammad Termeḏī, Sonan, ed. A. M. Šāker, Cairo, 1356/1936.
  • L. Veccia Vaglieri, “Fāṭima,” in EI2 II, pp. 841-50.
  • Abu ʿAbd-Allāh Muhammad Wāqedī, Ketāb al-maḡāzī, ed. J. Wellhausen, Cairo, 1970, s.v. Yaʿqūbī, Taʾrīkò II, pp. 19, 35, 42, 91, 128 ff., 141 ff.
  • A. Amanat, Resurrection and Renewal, Ithaca, N.Y., 1989.
  • Aʿyān al-šiʿa II, esp. pp. 535-639.
  • R. Aubert, “Fatima” [in Portugal], in Dictionnaire d’histoire et de géographie ecclésiastiques XVI, Paris, 1967, cols. 680-82.
  • M. Ayoub, “Towards an Islamic Christology: An Image of Jesus in Early Shīʿī Muslim Literature,” Muslim World 66, 1976, pp. 163-88.
  • Idem, Redemptive Suffering in Islam: A Study of the Devotional Aspects of ʿÃshûrâ in Twelver Shiʿism, The Hague, 1978.
  • J. Calmard, “Le culte de l’Imām Ḥusayn,” Ph.D. diss., University of Paris, 1975.
  • H. Corbin, Terre céleste et corps de résurrection: De l’Iran mazdéen à l’Iran shiʿite, Paris, 1960.
  • Idem, En Islam iranien, 4 vols., Paris 1971-72.
  • B. A. Donaldson, The Wild Rue, London, 1938.
  • Ibn Hešām, Sīra, Cairo, 1937, I, p. 206; III, p. 407.
  • W. Eilers, “Schiitische Wasserheilige,” in V. Haarmann and P. Bachmann, eds., Festschrift Hans Roemer, Beirut, 1979, pp. 94-125.
  • L. P. Elwell-Sutton and D. M. MacEoin, “Ḳurrat al-ʿAyn,” in EI2 V, p. 502.
  • J. N. Hollister, The Shīʿa of India, London, 1953.
  • M. K. Hermansen, “Fatimeh as a Role Model in the Works of Ali Shariʿati,” in G. Nashat, ed., Women and Revolution in Iran, Boulder, Colo., 1983, pp. 87-96.
  • R. Kriss and H. Kriss-Heinrich, Volksglaube im Bereich des Islam, 2 vols., Wiesbaden, 1960-62.
  • H. Lammens, Fāṭima et les filles de Mahomet: Notes critiques pour l’étude de la Sīra, Rome, 1912. Idem, “Fāṭima,” in EI1 II, pp. 85-88.
  • J. D. McAuliffe, “Chosen of All Women. Mary and Fāṭimah in Qurʾānic Exegesis,” Islamochristiana 7, 1981, pp. 19-28.
  • Idem, “Fāṭimah bint Muḥammad,” in M. Eliade, ed., The Encyclopaedia of ReligionV, New York, 1987, pp. 293-94.
  • L. Massignon, “Les origines de la méditation shiʿite sur Salmân et Fâṭima,” in Mélanges Henri Massé, Tehran, 1963, pp. 264-68.
  • Idem, Opera Minora, ed. Y. Moubarak, 3 vols., Paris, 1969.
  • Mrs. Meer Hassan Ali, Observations on the Mussulmauns of India, London, 1832; repr. Oxford, 1972.
  • D. Pinault, The Shiites: Ritual and Popular Piety in a Muslim Community, London, 1992.
  • E. Šakurzāda, ʿAqāyed wa rosūm-e ʿāmma-ye mardom-e Ḵorāsān, Tehran, 1346 Š./1967.
  • A. Šarīʿatī, Fatima, Fatima ast, Tehran, 1356 Š./1977; tr. L. Bakhtiar, Tehran, 1981.
  • A. Schimmel, Islamic Names, Edinburgh, 1989.
  • W. Schmucker, “Mubāhala,” in EI2 VII, pp. 276-77.
  • L. Veccia Vaglieri, “Fadak,” EI2 II, pp. 725-27.
  • Idem, “Fāṭima,” in EI2 II, pp. 841-50.
  • Hussain Wāʿeẓ Kāšefī, Rawżat al-šohadāʾ, ed. M. Ramażānī, Tehran, 1341 Š./1962.
  • A. J. Wensinck, A Handbook of Early Muhammadan Tradition, Leiden, 1927.
  • Idem, Concordances et indices de la tradition musulmane, 8 vols., Leiden, 1933-65.
  • Yaʿqūbī, Taʾrīḵ II, pp. 19, 35, 42, 91, 128-29, 141-42.
  • Taʿzīa literature. V. Cremonesi, tr., Uzurpazione di Fadak, Morte di Fatima, ʿUmar e Abu Bakr chiedono scusa, Naples, 1964 (three Cerulli MSS.).
  • Ḡaṣb-e bāḡ-e Fadak, ed. Z. Eqbāl and M. J. Maḥjūb as Jong-e šehādat, Tehran, 1355 Š./1976 (ed. of MS. Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, pers. 993), tr. A. Chodźko as “Le jardin de Fathema,” in Le théâtre persan, Paris, 1878.
  • W. Litten, Das Drama in Persien, Berlin and Leipzig, 1929, no. 9 (Fatima’s marriage).
  • L. Pelly, The Miracle Play of Hasan and Husain, 2 vols., London, 1879 (Vol. I, Scene vi, “The Seizure of the Khalifate by Abu Bakr”; Scene vii, “The Death of Fatimah” in English tr. only).
  • E. Rossi and A. Bombaci, Elenco di drammi religiosi persiani (fondo MSS. Vaticano Cerulli), Vatican City, 1961 (see esp. pp. 351-52, with index of themes connected with Fadak, ʿarūsī-e Qorayš, Karbala, death, etc., in the Cerulli, Chodźko, Pelly, and Moscow collections of taʿzīa plays).
  • Untitled MSS., Moscow, Kryzenski collection (see Rossi and Bombaci, pp. xvi, xxi, nos. 1 and 2, Death of Fatima).
  • Untitled MSS., Tehran, Ketāb-ḵāna-ye Malek (three plays on the death of Fatima). Wafāt-e Ḥażrat-e Fatima, MS. Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, pers. 993, Chodźko no. 4.
  • Specific prayers to Fatima. A. Monzawī, Fehrest nosḵahā-ye ḵaṭṭī-e Ketāb-ḵāna-ye Ganjbaḵš IV, p. 2364 no. 6702.
  • ʿA. Qomī, Mafātīḥ al-jenān, ed. M.–Ḥ. ʿElmī, Tehran, 1340 Š./1961 (doʿās to Fatima in Arabic with Persian translations, pp. 113, 601-2, 632-33, 660).

Source

  • Encyclopaedia Iranica
  • Veccia Vaglieri, L. (2007). “Fāṭima”, in: Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, Edited by: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs.