Automoderated users, Bots, Bureaucrats, checkuser, Comment administrators, Moderators, Administrators
9,545
edits
Ziarat al Warith: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
This group was large, for it included all those who contributed in fighting Hussain or facilitated the war against him, prepared for it, pledged allegiance to the tyrant for fighting him, mobilized and assisted in any other way in the campaign along with their adherents and followers. | This group was large, for it included all those who contributed in fighting Hussain or facilitated the war against him, prepared for it, pledged allegiance to the tyrant for fighting him, mobilized and assisted in any other way in the campaign along with their adherents and followers. | ||
The third group consisted of those that heard about the tragedy and approved of it. This group included those who heard Hussain’s call for help but did not help him, choosing their well-being instead of supporting the Lord of the Martyrs in the battle of Al-Taff. They are those who abandoned him on the day of Ashura. | The third group consisted of those that heard about the tragedy and approved of it. This group included those who heard Hussain’s call for help but did not help him, choosing their well-being instead of supporting the Lord of the Martyrs in the battle of [[Al-Taff]]. They are those who abandoned him on the day of Ashura. | ||
Their failure to join Hussain and support him, and their preference for this world over the next concealed their approval of Yazid’s actions, otherwise, such glaring negligence and opting for personal peace invariably leads to an approval of injustice. In other texts this group is described as having betrayed Abu Abdillah Hussain and preferred their well-being to supporting him. In the second general ziara we read: | Their failure to join Hussain and support him, and their preference for this world over the next concealed their approval of Yazid’s actions, otherwise, such glaring negligence and opting for personal peace invariably leads to an approval of injustice. In other texts this group is described as having betrayed Abu Abdillah Hussain and preferred their well-being to supporting him. In the second general ziara we read: | ||