Ammar b. Mu`awiya: Difference between revisions

From Wikihussain
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "'''Ammar b. Mu`awiya''' (d. 133) was the author of an account on the martyrdom of al-Hussain. ==the Battle of Karbala== From the little that has surv...")
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Ammar b. Mu`awiya''' (d. 133) was the author of an account on the [[martyrdom]] of [[Hussain ibn Ali|al-Hussain]].
{{Infobox companion of Imam (a)
| image =
| image size =
| caption =
| Full name =
| Companion of =
| Kunya =
| Epithet =
| Well Known As =
| Religious Affiliation =
| Lineage =
| Well known relatives =
| Birth =
| Place of Birth =
| Place of Residence =
| Death/martyrdom =
| Cause of Death/martyrdom =
| Burial place =
| Professors =
| Students =
| Works =
| Activities = Author of an account on the [[martyrdom]] of [[Hussain ibn Ali|al-Hussain]]
|Native name=عمار ابن معاویه}}'''Ammar b. Mu`awiya''' (d. 133) was the author of an account on the [[martyrdom]] of [[Hussain ibn Ali|al-Hussain]].


==the Battle of Karbala==
==the Battle of Karbala==
Line 5: Line 27:
From the little that has survived of Jabir's account, it is difficult to assess his work; but what remains does call into question the account of his contemporary, Ammar b. Mu`awiya al-Duhni.<ref>Seen. 3.</ref>
From the little that has survived of Jabir's account, it is difficult to assess his work; but what remains does call into question the account of his contemporary, Ammar b. Mu`awiya al-Duhni.<ref>Seen. 3.</ref>


This narrative is reported by [[al-Tabari]], and `Ammar claims to be reporting on the authority of the [[Imam al-Baqir]].
This narrative is reported by [[al-Tabari]], and `Ammar claims to be reporting on the authority of the [[Mohammad al-Baqir|Imam al-Baqir]].


The report begins with a vivid introduction in which Ammar says that he asked the Imam al-Baqir to tell him about the death of [[Hussain ibn Ali|al-Hussain]] so that it might be as if he was there himself. What follows is an account which agrees in its basic outline with the version of [[Ibn al-Kalbi]], while being much shorter and briefer.
The report begins with a vivid introduction in which Ammar says that he asked the Imam al-Baqir to tell him about the death of [[Hussain ibn Ali|al-Hussain]] so that it might be as if he was there himself. What follows is an account which agrees in its basic outline with the version of [[Ibn al-Kalbi]], while being much shorter and briefer.
Line 16: Line 38:


==Source==
==Source==
* [http://alhassanain.org/english/?com=book&id=111 A. Howard, Arabic Accounts of al-Husayn's Martyrdom]
 
*[http://alhassanain.org/english/?com=book&id=111 A. Howard, Arabic Accounts of al-Husayn's Martyrdom]


==Refrence==
==Refrence==
Line 22: Line 45:
[[Category: Islamic History]]
[[Category: Islamic History]]
[[Category:Historians]]
[[Category:Historians]]
<references />

Latest revision as of 10:42, 8 December 2020

Ammar b. Mu`awiya
Native nameعمار ابن معاویه
ActivitiesAuthor of an account on the martyrdom of al-Hussain

Ammar b. Mu`awiya (d. 133) was the author of an account on the martyrdom of al-Hussain.

the Battle of Karbala[edit | edit source]

From the little that has survived of Jabir's account, it is difficult to assess his work; but what remains does call into question the account of his contemporary, Ammar b. Mu`awiya al-Duhni.[1]

This narrative is reported by al-Tabari, and `Ammar claims to be reporting on the authority of the Imam al-Baqir.

The report begins with a vivid introduction in which Ammar says that he asked the Imam al-Baqir to tell him about the death of al-Hussain so that it might be as if he was there himself. What follows is an account which agrees in its basic outline with the version of Ibn al-Kalbi, while being much shorter and briefer.

This version seemingly adds nothing to Ibn al-Kalbi’s narrative. It differs only in giving a different house for the one which Muslim b. `Aqil stayed in when he came to Kufa; it does omit some of the things which Ibn al-Kalbi has reported, but nothing of real substance. What, then, is the purpose of this narrative? It is clearly put forward as the authoritative Shi’i account.

Ammar was a well-known traditionalist who, while being regarded as trustworthy by the general run of traditionalists, was also known for his Shi’i inclinations, and as an adherent of the Imam al-Baqir. He died in 133[2] and is claimed to have a book of traditions on the authority of the Imam al-Baqir.

This account might well be regarded as the official account of the Imam al-Baqir and therefore the one which should be accepted.

Source[edit | edit source]

Refrence[edit | edit source]

  1. Seen. 3.
  2. Ibn Hajar, Tadhib al- Tahdhib.