Editing Abu Mikhnaf (section)

==Historiography==
As far as Abu Mikhnaf's reports are concerned, it can be said that his approach was anti-[[Umayyad]] and in favour of [[Hussain ibn Ali|Imam al-Hussain]], but whether he was actually a Shi’i is questionable. Certainly, he is hostile to both [[Obayd-Allah Ibn Ziad|Ibn Ziyad]] and [[Yazid]]; both poke at the teeth in the head of the martyred Imam in his account.

Because of the nature of al-Tabaris annalistic approach to history, Abu Mikhnaf's beginning of the account is missing, as it does not belong to events of the year 60. Part of it may be preserved by [[al-Baladhuri]] by using the collective term qalu. When the [[Hasan B. ʿAli B. Abi Taleb|Imam al-Hasan]] died, the Shi’i in Iraq wrote to the Imam al-Hussain to ask him to come to lead them. He wrote back reminding them of the agreement that his brother had made with [[Mu'awiya]] and promising to lead them. Mu`awiya heard that the people thought that the Imam al-Hussain would lead them after his death and wrote to him warning him against this. The Imam al-Hussain wrote back denouncing him. Thus, the scene is set for the confrontation on the death of Mu'awiya.

The variety of Abu Mikhnaf's stories and his statement about the majority of the reporters<ref>U. Sezkin, op. cit., pp. 116-22</ref> suggest that he was reporting from an existing literature.